Sexual Abuse Gets Former House Speaker 15 months

Before long, the Illinois state legislators could be casting their votes to eliminate the statute of limitations regarding the sexual abuse of children. This is in response to a sentence of 15 months recently given to Dennis Hastert, former Speaker for the Illinois House of Representatives. Despite Hastert’s admission of guilt in the molestation of several young boys that he used to coach, the crimes in question fell outside the existing statute of limitations and the former politician could only be convicted for the crime of trying to bribe one of said sexual abuse victims several million dollars to keep the incident covered up.

Scott Cross, one of Hastert’s victims, testified before a federal court in Chicago about “his darkest secret”. That secret was that while participating in high school wrestling in 1979, Hastert had been his coach and had sexually abused him. Judge Thomas Durkin of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois expressed his frustration that Hastert could not be charged for the sexual abuse itself due to the statute of limitations. Durkin was not alone in this sentiment, as U.S. Attorney Zachary Fardon was quoted as saying, “I wish Mr. Hastert had been called on the carpet in 1968, and we’d all be better for it”.

Contrary to the current Illinois policy of allowing child victims of sexual abuse to bring charges against their attackers up to the age of 38, the 60’s and 70’s did not provide the opportunity for victims of similar crimes. Unfortunately, professionals who treat sexual abuse survivors advise that even 20+ years is not enough time for those who were abused as children to feel comfortable speaking out against their abuser. Often, this is because the individual in question is either someone they know/trust and/or is a well-respected member of the community. “That is the primary reason victims do not report – they won’t be believed”, says Polly Poskin of the Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault.

Poskin asserts that it often takes victims years to struggle through and understand the incident and why they were attacked, often blaming themselves. These individuals are forced to confront the pain, shame, and assumed guilt of their abuse.

This blog is not meant to dispense legal advice and is not a comprehensive review of the facts, the law, this topic or cases related to the topic. For a full review of our disclaimer and policies, please click here.

Who Can Be Held Liable for Injuries Caused by a Train?Who Can Be Held Liable for Injuries Caused by a Train?

Who Can Be Held Liable for Injuries Caused by a Train?

Although train accidents and train-passenger injuries occur less often than automobile-related injuries, with so many passenger, commuter, and freight trains on the track each day the potential to sustain an...
dash-camera-3

How a Dash Camera Can Help In Case of a Car Accident

While auto insurance companies do not offer discounts for drivers with dash cameras, it’s still wise to consider dash cams for your personal or business vehicles. They’re a small investment,...
Who can be held liable for injuries sustained as a rideshare passenger?

Who is liable for injuries sustained as a rideshare passenger?

Ridesharing apps like Uber and Lyft provide an efficient and ubiquitous means of transportation—more than 14 million trips are completed each day via Uber alone—but there is always the potential...