High-profile cases dominated the conversation in the Feb. 14 episode of Radio Law Talk, as Frederick W. Penney of Penney & Associates joined fellow lawyers to unpack developments in several headline-making legal battles — from a failed celebrity mediation to a possible retrial in one of the country’s most closely watched murder cases.
The discussion stayed focused on procedure, evidence, and courtroom strategy — and, at times, included the kind of candid observations that make the show distinct.
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni: Six Hours, No Settlement
The case remains set for trial in May. Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni participated in a mandatory settlement conference that lasted approximately six hours. Despite the length of the session — and even a working lunch — the case did not resolve. Trial remains scheduled.
Mandatory settlement conferences are standard in civil litigation. The parties are required to attend and attempt to resolve the case before trial. Sometimes those conferences are brief. A six-hour session, however, suggests meaningful negotiation took place.
Money Can’t Solve It All
The lawyers noted that in civil cases, settlements typically do not include an admission of liability. Payments are often made without either side conceding wrongdoing. That raised an important point in this dispute: if one party is seeking an acknowledgment or admission, that can create an obstacle that money alone cannot overcome.
The show also addressed the public nature of the case. Discovery has reportedly included text messages involving well-known individuals, and if the case proceeds to trial, those communications could become part of the public record. That dynamic adds another layer of pressure in high-profile litigation.
Baldoni Lists Ojai Home for Sale
Amid the ongoing litigation, Baldoni listed his Ojai property for approximately $8.8 million.
The move prompted discussion about asset exposure in civil litigation. When a significant damages claim is pending — here reportedly in the nine-figure range — the sale of major assets can draw attention.
The lawyers noted that people sell homes for many reasons. At the same time, in large civil cases, assets can become relevant if a substantial judgment is entered. The discussion did not speculate beyond that, but acknowledged that financial moves during active litigation are often scrutinized.
Alex Murdaugh Seeks a New Trial
The show turned to South Carolina, where Alex Murdaugh — convicted of murdering his wife and son — is seeking a new trial.
Jury Integrity Questioned
The basis for the request centers in part on allegations involving the clerk of court and potential jury influence. At least one juror reportedly stated that comments made outside the formal presentation of evidence affected how the evidence was viewed.
The lawyers emphasized that jury integrity is critical. Even the appearance of improper influence can create grounds for appellate review.
More Evidence Than Necessary?
Another issue discussed was the amount and type of financial misconduct evidence admitted at trial. While evidence of financial crimes can be relevant to motive, courts must weigh its probative value against potential prejudice. The concern raised was whether the volume or detail of that evidence went beyond what was necessary to establish motive.
The South Carolina Supreme Court has heard arguments, and the matter remains under consideration.
Who Owns the ‘Scream’ Mask?
The episode also covered a lawsuit involving the iconic Ghostface mask used in the Scream franchise.
According to the discussion, a company has asserted ownership rights over the mask design and has threatened litigation tied to its continued use. The franchise dates back to the mid-1990s, and licensing arrangements have been in place for decades.
Delay Can Be an Issue
The lawyers discussed timing as a key issue. When ownership claims surface many years after a product’s widespread use, questions can arise about delay and the legal consequences of waiting to assert rights.
In response, the studio reportedly filed legal action seeking a determination that it cannot be sued over the mask — essentially asking the court to clarify rights before being formally sued.
The dispute highlights how intellectual property issues can surface long after a film franchise becomes established.
A Reminder About Process
Throughout the episode, the conversation returned to one consistent point: procedure matters.
- Mandatory settlement conferences are required before trial.
- Juror conduct can affect the validity of a conviction.
- Evidentiary rulings can become appellate issues.
- Ownership claims depend on timing and prior agreements.
High-profile or not, cases move forward — or unravel — based on those fundamentals.
Courtroom strategy, evidence, and timing can shape the outcome of any case. If you’ve suffered an injury due to someone else’s negligence, don’t wait to get guidance. Penney & Associates offers free consultations to review your claim and explain your options. Contact us for a free consultation.
